Researcher and human rights activist, James Bilal. (Photo: Courtesy).

The South Sudan Human Rights Defenders Network (SSHRDN) has condemned the barring of independent media from the eighth session of the Machar trial in Juba this morning.

In a statement dated 8 October and seen by Eye Radio, the Network described the move as the “unlawful barring of independent media” from the trial of suspended First Vice President Dr. Riek Machar and eight co-accused—despite earlier assurances that proceedings would be open to the public.

SSHRDN said the decision undermines transparency, accountability, and the public’s right to information.

When the trial resumed this morning, independent journalists were blocked from entering the courtroom by security personnel.

Reporters who arrived early were initially told they could attend only if they surrendered their mobile phones, cameras, and recording devices.

Some complied and entered posing as ordinary citizens, but were soon ordered to leave.

While independent media outlets were excluded, journalists from the state-owned South Sudan Broadcasting Corporation (SSBC) were later allowed inside.

This came after an audio recording of Dr. Machar’s testimony—read aloud by the lead investigator—was leaked, despite the judge assuring that the session was to be held in camera, meaning no recordings or filming were permitted.

James Bidal, Head of Secretariat at SSHRDN, said the move raises serious concerns about press freedom and the fairness of the judicial process.

“This is a direct assault on the fundamental right to a free press and an independent judiciary. The government’s promise of an open trial must be honoured, not undermined by arbitrary restrictions. The public deserves to witness the proceedings of such a significant case to ensure justice is served,” Bidal said.

SSHRDN is calling for an immediate reversal of the decision and is urging authorities to guarantee unrestricted media access going forward.

The group argued that open trials are critical for maintaining public trust in the judicial system and for upholding justice and accountability.